Difference between revisions of "Difference With Compiere"

From ADempiere
Jump to: navigation, search
This Wiki is read-only for reference purposes to avoid broken links.
m (What is the real difference?)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
=What is the real difference?=
 
=What is the real difference?=
After 8 months into the project that leapt from the shoulders of Compiere, it is time to analyse what is the real difference and achievements possible from here onwards. There are now clear trends noticeable as well as enough critique done to the context of the project for us to arrive at a certain view of this project. Another feature special by [[User:Red1|Red1]] 08:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT).
+
After 8 months into the project that leapt from the shoulders of Compiere, it is time to analyse what is the real difference and achievements possible from here onwards. There are now clear trends noticeable as well as enough critique done to the context of the project for us to arrive at a certain view of this project. Another feature special initiated by [[User:Red1|Red1]] 08:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT).
  
 
==Has a Real and Live Community==
 
==Has a Real and Live Community==
Line 7: Line 7:
 
*Use of open tools such as WikiMedia to gather the community's constant accumulating contribution and experience.
 
*Use of open tools such as WikiMedia to gather the community's constant accumulating contribution and experience.
 
*Round the clock live presence in IRC room to share experience and assist newbies
 
*Round the clock live presence in IRC room to share experience and assist newbies
 +
*Multi-lingual and multi-cultural participation and adaptation to respective diverse usage.
 +
*Successful spread by word of mouth with no barriers of adoption
  
 
==Higher Code Quality==
 
==Higher Code Quality==
*Got more bugs resolved and remedies committed to the source code's trunk as fast they are discovered
+
*More bugs are resolved and remedies committed to the source code's trunk as fast they are discovered
 
*Non-existent round-trip for bugs to remain out there in the application suite
 
*Non-existent round-trip for bugs to remain out there in the application suite
 
*Win-win savings as users get to use ADempiere faster in their business, and consultants get to be paid easier for successful wins on the implementation.
 
*Win-win savings as users get to use ADempiere faster in their business, and consultants get to be paid easier for successful wins on the implementation.
Line 23: Line 25:
  
 
==Open Relationship==  
 
==Open Relationship==  
*With institutioal players from commercial and academic sectors
+
*With institutional players from commercial and academic sectors
 
*Pursuit of common open goals
 
*Pursuit of common open goals
 
*Invested by major players for utility value to respective core competency value-adding
 
*Invested by major players for utility value to respective core competency value-adding
*Hedged as stablising factor in volatile propreitary transition to open source marketplace
+
*Hedged as stablising factor in volatile proprietary transition to open source marketplace
  
=Future of ComPiere?=
+
=See Also=
Questions arise of what then may happen to Compiere itself. Though it is best left to the new investors in the board of Compiere to determine their path, speculation and analysis of its own public actions as well as the playing field which it operates on become public interest.
+
*[[FUD]] - Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt
==Change of Business Model==
+
*To a 2-tier open/close model that attempts to repeat other Open Source commercialisation that is itself questionable and uncertain as to its sustainability
+
*Dependency on need to ''sell'' its source to closed customers places a short fuse on its timetable to sell out faster
+
*Low interest in maintaining a subscription model where benefits are unclear and not scalable to higher set of needs.
+
*Fast flight of present adherents to other forks deplete previous business assumptions of a captive market. This shifts the figures greatly and forces a change of strategy midstream that adds to the gloomy picture.
+
==Slower versioning of source code==
+
*As compared to ADempiere spells lower competitiveness on a flat field it is operating on
+
*Closed developer model negates bazaar effect that accompany Open Source project. Robs Compiere of enjoyment costs savings and market advantages of fast turnover of versions.
+
  
==IPO Possibility Question Mark==
+
==Translations==
*Engagement of funding necessitates payback or financial results within a limited period usually within 3 years
+
[[{{PAGENAME}}_th|Thai (ไทย)]]
*Necessity of financial sustenance in present model pose liability of depleted returns due to absense of services model that is more appropriate of Open Source market.
+
 
*Requires business focus thwarted to quickly find a large investor buyout instead of towards the quality of the product itself
+
[[Category:Training materials]]
*Conditions presently not permitting an optimistic outlook for IPO or angel exit plan
+
[[Category:Marketing]]

Latest revision as of 23:41, 27 May 2010

What is the real difference?

After 8 months into the project that leapt from the shoulders of Compiere, it is time to analyse what is the real difference and achievements possible from here onwards. There are now clear trends noticeable as well as enough critique done to the context of the project for us to arrive at a certain view of this project. Another feature special initiated by Red1 08:53, 4 May 2007 (EDT).

Has a Real and Live Community

  • As can be seen in the project forums, the threads speaks for themselves about dynamism, liveliness, activity and collaboration. ADempiere has very high density of posts and online activity among its members around the world and round the clock wherever they are.
  • Ranking in SourceForge is calculated based on all round activity which keeps ADempiere at the top of the charts
  • Use of open tools such as WikiMedia to gather the community's constant accumulating contribution and experience.
  • Round the clock live presence in IRC room to share experience and assist newbies
  • Multi-lingual and multi-cultural participation and adaptation to respective diverse usage.
  • Successful spread by word of mouth with no barriers of adoption

Higher Code Quality

  • More bugs are resolved and remedies committed to the source code's trunk as fast they are discovered
  • Non-existent round-trip for bugs to remain out there in the application suite
  • Win-win savings as users get to use ADempiere faster in their business, and consultants get to be paid easier for successful wins on the implementation.
  • Both technical and subject matter logic bugs get resolved with more eyeballs of vast worldwide domain expertise
  • Increase in functional quality as determined by users and not limited to developers

Project Longetivity

  • Non-commercial ownership by any party of the ADempiere project
  • Constant influx of supporters and collaborators who openly declared their choice of ADempiere
  • Full empowerment to the community to setup business based on ADempiere without fear of source been ever closed by owner
  • GPL and open nature of project activity ensure transparency and minimal closed door politics
  • Maximum stability for commercial activity based on ADempiere on peer basis.

Open Relationship

  • With institutional players from commercial and academic sectors
  • Pursuit of common open goals
  • Invested by major players for utility value to respective core competency value-adding
  • Hedged as stablising factor in volatile proprietary transition to open source marketplace

See Also

  • FUD - Fear, Uncertainty, Doubt

Translations

Thai (ไทย)